Compare

Prowler vs Wiz: Open Cloud Security Platform vs Closed, Provider Owned Security Platform

Prowler is an open cloud security platform that covers 16 cloud and SaaS providers and 70+ compliance frameworks at a fraction of Wiz's cost. Wiz is a proprietary CNAPP now owned by Google after a $32 billion acquisition. Here is how they compare on architecture, pricing, coverage, trust, and extensibility.

Prowler vs Wiz at a glance

The fast answer

Open and independent vs proprietary and Google-owned. Here is how the two platforms stack up on the things that actually drive the decision.

Up to 25xlower cost than Wiz
per-account, not per-workload
Any CI/CDpipeline-native scanning
Wiz's CI/CD is Terraform-only
Openopen source & inspectable
Wiz is a closed black box
RecommendedProwlerOpen cloud security platformWizNow owned by Google ($32B)
License Apache 2.0 open source Proprietary, closed source
Time to first scan Free and self-service, findings in minutes Demo request and sales cycle, no self-service
Pricing model Per cloud account ($79–$99/mo) Per workload (~$24K/yr per 100)
Cloud & SaaS providers 16, every connector open source Broad coverage, but closed source
CI/CD pipelines Any pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, CodeBuild) HCP Terraform only
Compliance frameworks 70+ incl. custom frameworks ~40 (not publicly documented)
Custom checks Yes, Python, AI-assisted via Studio No
Source code inspectable Yes, every check on GitHub No, black box
Owner independence Independent company Google (acquired March 2026)
AWS Security Hub Official partner, recommended by AWS Partner integration
Attack path analysis Open (Neo4j + Cartography) Proprietary Security Graph
MCP / AI agent support Native MCP, query and extend MCP server, query only
Choose your AI model Top OpenAI model included, or bring your own via Amazon Bedrock or OpenRouter Fixed vendor AI, no model choice
Community contributors 300+ None (proprietary)
Try Prowler now. With Wiz, you wait for a sales call. Prowler is free and fully functional the moment you sign up, no credit card. Connect a cloud account and you are reading real findings in minutes. Wiz has no self-service trial, so you fill out a form, wait for a rep, and it can be days or weeks before you see your own environment. You can finish evaluating Prowler before that demo is even scheduled.

45M+Downloads
14K+GitHub Stars
300+Contributors
16Cloud Providers
70+Compliance Frameworks

The Fundamental Difference: Open vs Closed

Prowler and Wiz take fundamentally different approaches to cloud security. Prowler is an open cloud security platform built on an Apache 2.0 licensed codebase with 14,000+ GitHub stars and 300+ contributors. Every check, every detection rule, every compliance mapping is inspectable, auditable, and modifiable. Your security team can read the exact code that protects your infrastructure.

Wiz is a proprietary, closed-source detection engine. You cannot inspect how Wiz determines a finding. You cannot modify checks to match your organization's specific security posture requirements. You cannot audit the logic behind a compliance result. You accept whatever the vendor ships.

This matters practically. When a compliance auditor asks "how does your tool determine this finding?", Prowler users can point to the exact Python class and its execute() method. Wiz users can point to a PDF. When your security team disagrees with a detection rule's logic, Prowler users can fork it. Wiz users submit a feature request and wait.

Prowler was created in 2016 by Toni de la Fuente, a former AWS security engineer who understood that cloud security tooling needs to be transparent, auditable, and vendor-neutral. That philosophy is baked into the architecture. Organizations like Salesforce, Siemens, Tesla, and IBM trust Prowler, as do over 300 contributors who have battle-tested the codebase across thousands of real-world environments.

Open source is the trust signal. You do not need to take Prowler's word for how it works. You can verify it yourself. That transparency is what earns the trust of 45 million downloads and endorsements from AWS itself. Learn more about CSPM.

Cost Comparison: Prowler Is 10x Less Expensive

Prowler Cloud uses per-account pricing. Wiz charges per workload. That structural difference means Prowler costs a fraction of Wiz at every scale, and the gap widens as your environment grows.

Scenario: 10 AWS Accounts

Prowler Cloud Standard: 10 accounts x $79/month = $790/month = $9,480/year

Wiz Essential (estimated): An organization with 10 AWS accounts typically runs 500 to 2,000+ workloads. At $240/workload/year (Wiz Essential pricing from AWS Marketplace data), 500 workloads = $120,000/year. For 1,000 workloads = $240,000/year.

That is 12x to 25x the cost of Prowler Cloud.

Scenario: 50 AWS Accounts (Mid-Market)

Prowler Cloud Standard: 50 accounts x $79/month = $3,950/month = $47,400/year

Wiz (estimated): Enterprise contracts at this scale are reported at mid-six figures, typically $200,000 to $500,000+/year (per Vendr marketplace data).

Prowler is 4x to 10x less expensive at this scale.

Why Prowler's pricing model is structurally cheaper

  • Per-account pricing means your cost scales with your organizational structure, not with the number of EC2 instances, Lambda functions, or S3 buckets you run.
  • No per-user fees. Your entire security team, DevOps team, and compliance team can all access the platform without additional charges.
  • No module upselling. You do not pay extra for compliance frameworks, IaC scanning, or Kubernetes support.
  • The open source foundation means R&D costs are shared with a global community. That efficiency gets passed to customers.
  • The open source CLI is completely free. No workload limits, no feature gates, no time-limited trials.
Wiz pricing is not public. Wiz does not publish pricing on its website. The estimates above are based on AWS Marketplace listings and Vendr contract data. Wiz Essential starts at approximately $24,000/year for 100 workloads. Wiz Advanced runs approximately $38,000/year for 100 workloads. Add-ons like Wiz Code ($58,500/year for 100 units) and Wiz Defend ($18,000/year for 300GB log ingestion) increase total cost further. Cloud security budgets typically run $10 to $50 per workload per month.

Customization and AI-Native Extensibility

Prowler is built to be extended. Every security check is a Python class with a metadata YAML file. Any security engineer can write a custom check in under an hour. That extensibility is not a future promise: organizations like Inditex (the parent company of Zara), Spain's National Cryptologic Center (CCN), and AWS have contributed extensions to the platform.

Available today

  • Custom checks via Python: inherit from the Check base class, implement execute(), return CheckReport objects. Standard pattern, well-documented, battle-tested.
  • Prowler Studio: AI assistant that helps create threat detection checks, generate remediations, and update compliance frameworks.
  • Prowler MCP Server (mcp.prowler.com/mcp): Exposes Prowler's capabilities to any MCP-compatible AI agent. Security teams can build agentic workflows where Claude Code, Cursor, or other AI tools query findings, trigger scans, and correlate results.
  • Custom compliance frameworks: map any regulatory requirement to Prowler checks using YAML configuration. Model your internal security policies as a trackable framework.
  • Extensible plugin architecture: proven pattern for adding entirely new cloud provider support.

Architecture direction (roadmap)

Prowler's extensible plugin architecture is designed so that new cloud provider support can be added dynamically. The goal: enable AI harnesses (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini Code Assist, or any MCP-compatible agent) to analyze a cloud provider's API documentation, generate the service client and corresponding security checks, and submit them for review. When Prowler added Cloudflare support, it shipped with 29 checks covering DNS, SSL/TLS, WAF, access control, and zone configuration. That same pattern is replicable for any cloud service with a well-documented API.

With Wiz: You submit a feature request. You wait. You have no visibility into the roadmap or timeline. You cannot build your own checks. You cannot contribute. The platform evolves based on Wiz's (now Google's) commercial priorities, not your security needs.

Choose the AI Model That Powers Your Security

Most platforms hand you one AI assistant running one model, take it or leave it, on the vendor's infrastructure. Prowler lets you choose the model behind your AI security workflows. That matters for two reasons: performance, and keeping your data inside your own boundary.

  • Best-in-class by default. Your Prowler license includes the top-performing model from OpenAI, so you get state-of-the-art AI out of the box with nothing to set up.
  • Bring your own model from Amazon Bedrock. Prefer a different model, or need every prompt and response to stay inside your perimeter? Point Prowler at Amazon Bedrock and run the entire AI workflow within your own security boundary. Your data does not leave your environment. That is a hard requirement for regulated and security-conscious teams, and it is a choice Wiz does not give you.
  • Bring a custom or OpenAI-compatible model via OpenRouter. Run your own fine-tuned model, or any OpenAI-compatible model available through OpenRouter. You are never locked into one vendor's idea of which AI you should use.
With Wiz, the AI is whatever Google ships, running wherever Google runs it. With Prowler, you decide which model analyzes your cloud and where that analysis happens. Model flexibility plus data residency is a differentiator no closed CNAPP can match.

Coverage and CI/CD: Open Connectors, Pipeline-Native

Both Prowler and Wiz cover a broad set of clouds and SaaS platforms, so this is not a contest about a raw provider count. Wiz supports AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Alibaba Cloud, Cloudflare, Vercel, VMware, Kubernetes, Microsoft 365, Okta, GitHub, GitLab, and more. The real differences are that every Prowler connector is open source and inspectable, and that Prowler runs natively in any CI/CD pipeline while Wiz's pipeline coverage is essentially HCP Terraform.

Prowler coverage depth (16 providers, all open source)

  • AWS: The deepest coverage of any open source tool. Hundreds of checks across 60+ services. Official AWS Security Hub partner integration (AWS recommends Prowler per the AWS Security Blog). Supports AWS European Sovereign Cloud.
  • Azure: Full CIS Benchmark coverage including Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) MFA checks. Includes Bicep remediation code.
  • GCP: CIS Benchmark coverage with Cloud Asset Inventory integration.
  • Kubernetes: CIS Kubernetes Benchmark with cluster-level and namespace-level security checks.
  • Microsoft 365: Powered by a custom hybrid architecture using Microsoft Graph API and controlled PowerShell sessions (py-pwsh-session, open sourced by Prowler).
  • GitHub and Okta: Repository, organization, and identity security configuration checks.
  • Cloudflare: 29 checks covering DNS, SSL/TLS, WAF, access control, and zone configuration.
  • Plus: Google Workspace, MongoDB Atlas, Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud, OpenStack, Vercel, and more.
  • Infrastructure as Code: Terraform and CloudFormation scanning via Trivy integration.

CI/CD is where the gap is real

Prowler is a CLI and container, so it drops into any pipeline you already run. It ships an official GitHub Action and documented GitLab CI support, and it runs anywhere you can run a command or a container: Jenkins, Azure DevOps, CircleCI, AWS CodeBuild, Bitbucket Pipelines, and more. You can fail a build on a policy violation and catch misconfigurations before they ever reach production.

Wiz's CI/CD story is much narrower. On its own supported-environments list, the entire CI/CD category is HCP Terraform. If you want security checks running across your real pipeline estate, that is a meaningful difference, and because Prowler is open source you can wire it into custom or in-house pipelines that no vendor would build a connector for.

The honest version: Wiz covers a lot of clouds, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What Prowler gives you is open, inspectable connectors and security scanning that runs natively in any CI/CD pipeline, not just Terraform.

Compliance Framework Coverage: 70+ Frameworks

Prowler maps findings to over 70 compliance frameworks. This is where Prowler's depth is unmatched. Wiz supports an estimated 40 frameworks (Wiz does not publicly document the exact count).

Industry standards

CIS Benchmarks (multiple versions including 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 4.0), NIST 800-53 (Rev. 4 and Rev. 5), NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), CISA Cyber Essentials, MITRE ATT&CK.

Regulatory

RBI (Reserve Bank of India), FedRAMP (Moderate and High), PCI-DSS (v3.2.1 and v4.0), NIS2.

Privacy and data protection

GDPR, HIPAA, FFIEC.

Governance

SOC 2 (Type II), GXP, ISO 27001.

Cloud-native

AWS Foundational Technical Review (FTR), AWS Well-Architected Framework (Security Pillar), BSI C5.

National security

ENS (Spain's Esquema Nacional de Seguridad), KISA ISMS-P (Korean). These regional frameworks exist in Prowler because the open source community contributed them. No other CNAPP has Korean frameworks. This is the power of an open source community: contributors build what they actually need.

Custom frameworks

Build any framework by mapping your internal security requirements to Prowler checks via YAML. Model your company's security policies as a compliance framework, track adherence automatically, and export audit-ready reports. This is unique to Prowler.


Trust and Independence

Your security tool should not be owned by a cloud provider that competes with the infrastructure you are securing. After Google completed its $32 billion acquisition of Wiz on March 11, 2026, this is exactly the situation Wiz customers face.

Google says Wiz will remain multi-cloud. But no contractual guarantee of perpetual multi-cloud support exists. Multiple industry analysts have raised concerns:

  • Forrester VP Merritt Maxim called Wiz a potential "Trojan horse" for Google Cloud workload migration.
  • Deepwatch PM Kaushik Devireddy raised concerns about whether cloud-equality will hold up under Google ownership.
  • Sysdig CFO Karen Walker noted Wiz customer concerns about the acquisition's impact.

Prowler is independently owned and open source. The community, including contributions from organizations like AWS, Inditex, and Spain's CCN, ensures the platform evolves based on real-world security needs, not a cloud vendor's commercial incentives.

AWS itself trusts Prowler: native Security Hub partner integration, AWS Security Blog guides on using Prowler, and explicit recommendations to customers. Prowler is also a CIS Security partner (listed on cisecurity.org). Prowler Cloud is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant. These are third-party validations that cannot be bought with acquisition dollars.


Attack Paths and Risk Prioritization

Both Prowler and Wiz offer attack path analysis. They take different architectural approaches.

Prowler Attack Paths

Open source, built on Neo4j and Cartography (a CNCF project). Combines cloud inventory graph data with Prowler findings to trace real attack chains. Uses openCypher queries from pathfinding.cloud. You can write custom queries, inspect the graph model, and extend the path analysis. The underlying graph technology (Neo4j) is an industry standard.

Wiz Security Graph

Proprietary graph correlating misconfigurations, network exposure, identity privileges, and vulnerabilities. Well-regarded for visualizing "toxic combinations." The UX is polished and mature. However, you cannot write custom queries, inspect the graph model, or extend the analysis.

Prowler ThreatScore provides weighted risk prioritization that considers severity, context, and impact to help teams focus on what matters first. Prowler's approach is open and extensible. Wiz's approach is more polished in its current UX. Both get you to attack path visibility, but only Prowler lets you customize and extend the analysis.


Integration into Agentic AI and MSSP Workflows

Prowler is built for the way modern security operations are headed: AI-assisted, automated, and API-first.

  • Prowler MCP Server: Any MCP-compatible AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, or any tool that speaks MCP) can query findings, trigger scans, and correlate results. Security operations can be automated with agentic workflows.
  • OCSF-native output: Prowler findings use the Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework, making them immediately consumable by any SIEM, SOAR, or data platform that supports OCSF.
  • MSSP-friendly architecture: The open source license and per-account pricing let MSSPs build profitable managed services without per-seat licensing eating margins. Custom checks, white-label reporting, and multi-tenant scanning are all supported.
  • CI/CD integration: Run Prowler in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, or any pipeline. Block deployments that fail security checks.

Wiz has an MCP server available on AWS Marketplace, and it integrates with CI/CD pipelines. But the underlying platform is closed. You can query Wiz findings via MCP, but you cannot extend the detection logic, add custom checks through the MCP interface, or build new provider support. For MSSPs, Wiz's per-workload pricing and closed architecture make it harder to build differentiated, cost-effective managed services.


Who Should Choose Prowler

Prowler is the right choice for specific teams and specific situations. Here is who benefits most.

Security teams at AWS-heavy organizations

Prowler has the deepest AWS coverage of any open source tool, native Security Hub integration, and AWS's explicit recommendation. If you run primarily on AWS, Prowler is the obvious choice.

Teams concerned about vendor neutrality

After Google's $32B acquisition of Wiz, independence matters. Prowler is independently owned and open source. No cloud provider controls the roadmap.

Cost-conscious teams that refuse to compromise

Prowler Cloud delivers enterprise-grade CSPM at a fraction of Wiz's cost. The open source CLI is free with zero limitations. Per-account pricing means no surprise bills as your workload count grows.

MSSPs and security consultancies

The open source license and per-account pricing let you build profitable managed services without per-seat licensing eating your margins. Custom checks and multi-tenant scanning are built in.

Teams building AI-native security operations

Prowler's MCP server and extensible architecture make it the platform for agentic security workflows. Query findings, trigger scans, and correlate results programmatically.

Multi-cloud orgs beyond the big three

If you use Cloudflare, Alibaba Cloud, OpenStack, Microsoft 365, or GitHub alongside AWS/Azure/GCP, Prowler covers your entire environment. Wiz does not.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is Prowler a good alternative to Wiz?

Yes. Prowler is the leading open cloud security platform with 45M+ downloads and 14K+ GitHub stars. It covers 16 cloud and SaaS providers with open source connectors, runs in any CI/CD pipeline, supports 70+ compliance frameworks, and costs roughly 10x less. Your security team can inspect every check and every line of detection logic.

How much does Prowler cost compared to Wiz?

Prowler Cloud Standard costs $79/account/month. For 10 AWS accounts, that is $9,480/year. Wiz Essential starts at roughly $240/workload/year, meaning an equivalent environment costs $120,000+/year. Prowler's open source CLI is completely free.

Is Prowler open source?

Yes. Prowler is open source under the Apache 2.0 license. Every security check, compliance mapping, and detection rule is publicly available on GitHub. Prowler Cloud is the managed SaaS platform built on this open source foundation.

Does Prowler work with AWS Security Hub?

Yes. Prowler is an official AWS Security Hub partner. AWS recommends Prowler for sending findings to Security Hub, as documented on the AWS Security Blog.

What happened to Wiz after the Google acquisition?

Google completed its $32 billion all-cash acquisition of Wiz on March 11, 2026. Wiz is now part of Google Cloud. Google says Wiz will remain multi-cloud, but no contractual guarantee exists. Forrester VP Merritt Maxim called Wiz a potential "Trojan horse" for Google Cloud migration.

Can Prowler replace Wiz for cloud security?

For CSPM, compliance, and posture management: yes, with broader cloud coverage and lower cost. Wiz has current advantages in runtime protection, DSPM, and finding correlation. Prowler is actively closing the correlation gap.

How many cloud providers does Prowler support?

16 cloud and SaaS providers: AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, GitHub, Okta, MongoDB Atlas, Cloudflare, Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud, OpenStack, Vercel, and more. Wiz also covers a broad set of clouds and SaaS platforms; the Prowler difference is open source connectors and security scanning that runs in any CI/CD pipeline.

Are companies switching from Wiz to Prowler?

Yes. Concerns about vendor neutrality following Google's $32 billion acquisition of Wiz have accelerated interest in independent, open alternatives. Organizations that want transparency into their detection logic, security scanning in any CI/CD pipeline, or lower cloud security spend are evaluating Prowler as a replacement.


Try Prowler Cloud Free, No Credit Card Required

Connect your first cloud account in minutes. See what Prowler finds that Wiz misses. 16 cloud and SaaS providers, 70+ compliance frameworks, full transparency.

Try Prowler Cloud Free, No Credit Card Required